Woman allegedly discovered secret that changed her husband’s life while reading the newspaper: “ A whole second life ”

The New York Times

Long after Trump’s loss, push to inspect ballots persists

Georgia has already counted its 2020 presidential vote three times, with the same result: President Joe Biden narrowly but decisively defeated Donald Trump. But now parts of the vote will be inspected for the fourth time, after a judge ruled late last week that a group of voters should be allowed to see copies of the 147,000 absent ballots cast in the ballot box. the largest county in the state. The movement has limited weight. Plaintiffs, led by known conspiracy theorist, will not have access to actual ballots, Georgia election results have already been certified after recounts and audits show Biden to be the winner without evidence of fraud , and the examination will not affect the result. But Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero’s order was a victory for a watchdog group of plaintiffs who said they were looking for electoral fraud cases, repeating Trump’s election lies. . Election officials in Fulton County, which contains most of Atlanta, fear that if such a scrutiny happens there, it could cast further doubt on the state’s results and give Republican lawmakers ammunition to gain greater power over the administration of elections. Sign up for The Morning New York Times’ Where Does It End? It’s like a never-ending circus, that big lie, ”Robb Pitts, Democratic chairman of the Fulton County Commissioners Council, said Monday. “When they accused Fulton County and me in particular, I listened and I said – I said to the president and his officials and I said to the secretary of state, ‘If you have any evidence wrongdoing, bring it to me. Otherwise, sit up or shut up. And I repeat it again today. The move in Georgia – a state that for months resisted attacks from Trump and his allies when they falsely claimed the election was stolen – coincided with a widely criticized recount of over 2 million votes issued by Republicans in Maricopa County, Arizona, the largest non-state county that surprised Republicans by switching to Biden last year after decades of GOP dominance in the presidential election. The recount, which was approved by the Arizona state government and funded by the private sector, resumed Monday despite broad and bipartisan denunciations of the effort as a political sham and growing evidence that it is fueled by Trump’s “Stop the Steal” allies. The Republic of Arizona reported on Saturday that volunteers recruited to help recount Maricopa’s ballots were being scrutinized by an organization set up by Patrick Byrne, former CEO of online retailer Overstock.com and a prominent provider of theories. of the plot that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump. . On Monday, azmirror.com, an independent nonprofit outlet, reported that Wake Technology Services, which performs the manual recount, was hired in December for an election audit in Pennsylvania by a nonprofit group led by Sidney Powell, a former member of Trump’s Legal Team and leading provider of election conspiracy theories. Late Monday, Trump continued to denounce the election results, citing the Arizona recount and the Georgia court ruling. “More to follow,” he said in a statement released by his office. Efforts to continue to question the legitimacy of the election in two critical battlefield states, nearly seven months after the vote ended, illustrate Trump’s grip on the Republican Party and the persistence of his misrepresentation election. Even though Trump is not directly involved in the ongoing scrutiny of the votes in Arizona and Georgia, the widespread refusal of his supporters to accept the reality of Biden’s victory has led his fellow Republicans to find new and inventive ways to question and delegitimize the 2020 results. Garland Favorito is leading the ballot review effort in Georgia, a political fly from Georgia that has lingered on the fringes of the US political plot for decades. In 2002, he published a book questioning the origin of the September 11, 2001 attacks. He also doctored unproven theories about the Kennedy assassination, and in 2014 he appeared in a video promoting the idea. that the 14th Amendment was itself unconstitutional and argued that the federal government was therefore illegitimate and should be overthrown. In an interview, Favorito cited his “15 years” experience as a self-proclaimed election investigator, saying he was first motivated by Georgia’s purchase of new election machines that did not keep records. of your paper. He said his concerns about the 2020 election stemmed largely from affidavits filed by former election officials who claimed to have manipulated ballots that appeared to be forged because they were not folded, appeared to be marked by a machine or had been printed on a different stock. . (There is no evidence of the widespread use of counterfeit ballots.) Although Favorito refused to accept the findings of recounts and audits already carried out in Georgia, he said he would be satisfied if, after inspecting the copies of the ballots, he and his team found no problems. “Once we find out the truth, if the results were correct, we can all go home and sleep at night knowing it was right from the start,” Favorito said. But he doesn’t view Georgia’s top Republicans – some of whom, like former Senator Kelly Loeffler, vocally support his efforts – as allies. “The Republican establishment has not contacted at all,” he said, adding that he did not vote for Trump but for a third candidate. And funding for the inspection, he said, would come from “patriots” making small donations. “We don’t have a lot of money.” The spread and repetition of false election claims follow familiar patterns of disinformation, which often occupy segmented corners of the internet and social media. Both algorithmic and organic forces will surface – like electoral fraud theories based on grainy social media videos or anonymous allegations – for people who are inclined to subscribe to them. But what further fueled Trump’s election demands, aside from his continued public statements, were the numerous lawsuits brought by the former president and his allies after the 2020 election. “Even though all lawsuits were dismissed, the Trump campaign has filed a whole slew of baseless lawsuits, which adds a layer of legitimacy when you read a lawsuit that has been brought against a rumor, allegation, or online content. Said Lisa Kaplan, founder of the Alethea Group, a company that helps fight disinformation. “It takes him up a notch.” Georgia’s effort could also extend beyond the Republican Echo Chamber in which the 2020 election is still in dispute. The state’s new electoral law ensures that the General Assembly, which is currently controlled by Republicans, has broad authority over the counties through a restructured electoral council. The council can, among other things, suspend county election officials. As Favorito performed a victory lap in pro-Trump media, he was praised by top Republicans in Georgia. David Shafer, the pro-Trump president of the Georgia Republican Party, sent an email to fellow Republicans on Friday calling Amero’s move “a very important and encouraging development.” Loeffler also praised Favorito’s efforts. “While there is an urgent need to investigate a number of other well-documented issues, we also need to inspect Fulton County mail-in ballots to reassure Georgians that their voices are being heard and their votes are being counted. She said. Even Brad Raffensperger, Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State, has shown his support for the inspection led by Favorito’s group. “Allowing this audit provides another layer of transparency and citizen engagement,” Raffensperger said in a statement Friday. The support of Raffensperger, currently running for re-election, surprised some political observers in Georgia. It was the secretary of state who resisted Trump-backed false allegations of election fraud in Georgia and pointed to audits conducted by state government officials last year as a definitive reaffirmation of election results. . His office also filed an amicus brief in the lawsuit, arguing that Favorito’s group should not receive physical ballots for security reasons, although Raffensperger took no position on the case in his memory. “From day one, I encouraged Georgians concerned about the elections in their counties to pursue these demands through legal channels,” Raffensperger said in his statement. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. © 2021 The New York Times Company

Comments are closed.